• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Collaborative Review of Controversial Science
  • Newsfeed
  • Preprint Feeds
    • Preprint Feed – Ecology
    • Preprint Feed – Occupational and Environmental Health
    • Preprint Feed – Epidemiology
  • Groups
    Sign in
    The Science Collaborative
    The Science Collaborative
    • Collaborative Review of Controversial Science
    • Newsfeed
    • Preprint Feeds
      • Preprint Feed – Ecology
      • Preprint Feed – Occupational and Environmental Health
      • Preprint Feed – Epidemiology
    • Groups
      • Profile photo of BobMorris

        BobMorris posted an update

        5 months ago

        Fascinating piece on the challenge of communicating complicated science to the public and how that led to MAHA.

        https://buttondown.com/abbycartus/archive/candle-in-the-wind/

        buttondown.com

        Candle in the wind

        Since Trump’s election and the appointment of his anti-science MAHA cabinet, there’s a Carl Sagan quotation I’ve been seeing floating around the internet in...

        Walker, donnag and Adrian
        1 Comment
        • Profile photo of donnag
          donnag

          The author does a really nice job of tracing the current dystopian misinformation campaigns to events in the 1950s and 60s, including the response to new NSF-sponsored high-school science curricula back in the 1960s, e.g. the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS yellow, green and blue versions). Does anyone remember those? I know they certainly impacted me positively when I was in high school in the mid-70s. They were terrific, evidenced-based teaching materials embodying both rich modern content and John A. Moore’s notion of “science as a way of knowing”. They also included well-crafted, intentional professional development for teachers. Moreover, that kind of rigorous thinking in the 1960s and 1970s strongly influenced both the first and second versions of national science education standards in the early 1990s and again in the early-mid 2000s0, which also have been lambasted by the same kind of non-truth-seeking deniers. One result, as the author notes, was the rise of “Creation Science”, which is as strong if not stronger today than back then. See, for example, the work and budget of the conservative Discovery Institute, and the influence of Michael Behe’s “irreproducible complexity” argument in “Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution.
          “

          Indeed, the fundamentalist revolt continues but in a different, more virulent form with bigger, more effective, and more well-funded megaphones, and more tools to mobilize and influence people not to think rationally. It’s masterful skulduggery. I agree with the author that that is our great, and arguably existential challenge.

          1
          5 months ago
      • Public
      • All Members
      • My Connections
      • Only Me
      • Public
      • All Members
      • My Connections
      • Only Me
      • Public
      • All Members
      • My Connections
      • Only Me
      © 2025 - A WordPress Site

      Report

      There was a problem reporting this post.

      Harassment or bullying behavior
      Contains mature or sensitive content
      Contains misleading or false information
      Contains abusive or derogatory content
      Contains spam, fake content or potential malware

      Block Member?

      Please confirm you want to block this member.

      You will no longer be able to:

      • See blocked member's posts
      • Mention this member in posts
      • Invite this member to groups
      • Message this member
      • Add this member as a connection

      Please note: This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin. Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.

      Report

      You have already reported this .