-
BobMorris posted an update in the group
6 weeks agoDefending Public Health
A deeply flawed study in a New Journal started with Trumps nominees for NIH and FDA will severly undermine the credibility of serious science. The huge flaws in their first foray into original science d original science they published demonstrates the serious risk posed to scientific credibility posed by this journal.
open.substack.com
The Mocking of the Scientific Journal: Part Two
Peer reviewed journals have serious problems, but the first issue of the journal of the newly invented Academy of Public Health shows its new model to be far worse.
-
Sadly, I think what you describe here will be the new federal standard of acceptable research under RFK Jr.: Cherry-pick whatever data fits your preconceived conclusions.
1-
@BruceMirken Exactly my fear, Bruce. I call it conclusion forward science. The entire infrastructure for defining the credibility of research is at risk. Addressing this should be a key function of DPH.
-
-